May 13, 2025
  • Home
  • Default
  • Unleashing Power: A Deep Dive into the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D’s 16-Core Gaming Brilliance
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D evaluation: 16 cores plus prime-tier gaming performance

Unleashing Power: A Deep Dive into the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D’s 16-Core Gaming Brilliance

By on March 11, 2025 0 36 Views

The comprehensive overview of the CPU issues from AMD.


Image credit attribution: Digital Foundry

The tale of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is straightforward: it performs remarkably similar to the outstanding Ryzen 7 9800X3D in gaming, essentially, yet boasts double the cores, making it significantly more proficient in content creation activities such as 3D modeling or video transcoding where all available threads are utilized. If you are seeking a single CPU that can do it all, this is the one to acquire – even though it comes with a steep price tag of £659 in the UK and $699 in the US.

Like the 9800X3D that was released late in 2024, the 9950X3D features a notably enhanced L3 cache compared to a standard Ryzen 9000 processor, positioned beneath the CCD instead of above it as observed in earlier Ryzen X3D models. This configuration allows us to achieve that performance-enhancing edge without the detrimental impact on temperatures and clock speeds that previously defined X3D processors in comparison to their standard variants; a perfect blend of benefits.

To fully appreciate the level of performance on offer, we have run the 9950X3D through a full suite of 11 game benchmarks at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, including some of the most demanding single-player (Dragon’s Dogma, Starfield, Cyberpunk) and multiplayer (CS2, F1 24) titles.


Image credit attribution: AMD

Before we delve into that, it’s worth examining the specifications here to get a sense of the kind of performance we can expect in content creation scenarios.

In summary, the 9950X3D is impressively optimistic for content creation, as it maintains the same rated boost and base clock speeds and TDP compared to the 9950X, with a complete doubling of L3 cache. This suggests that it will likely match or potentially exceed the 9950X in typical workloads, although the 3D V-Cache may consume slightly more energy and generate somewhat more heat. This is a reasonable shift from even the Ryzen 7000 X3D processors, where reduced clock speeds and heightened temperatures resulted in a slight performance regression in all-core tasks.

It’s also essential to note that this is the most expensive Ryzen processor to date, with its $699 price point aligning with the 7950X3D and $100 above the 9950X. The graphics card market has experienced a surge in units selling far above MSRP, but hopefully we won’t see a similar trend for CPUs that do not utilize the “board partner” model.

CPU architecture Boost Base L3 cache TDP Price
Ryzen 9 9950X3D Zen 5 16C/32T 5.7GHz 4.3GHz 128MB 170W £659/$699
Ryzen 9 9950X Zen 5 16C/32T 5.7GHz 4.3GHz 64MB 170W £549/$539
Ryzen 9 9900X3D Zen 5 12C/24T 5.5GHz 4.4GHz 128MB 120W £TBA/$599
Ryzen 9 9900X Zen 5 12C/24T 5.6GHz 4.4GHz 64MB 120W £399/$379
Ryzen 7 9800X3D Zen 5 8C/16T 5.2GHz 4.7GHz 96MB 120W £479/$479
Ryzen 7 9700X Zen 5 8C/16T 5.5GHz 3.8GHz 32MB 65W £309/$289
Ryzen 5 9600X Zen 5 6C/12T 5.4GHz 3.9GHz 32MB 65W £214/$229
Ryzen 9 7950X3D Zen 4 16C/32T 5.7GHz 4.2GHz 128MB 120W OOS/$740
Ryzen 9 7950X Zen 4 16C/32T 5.7GHz 4.5GHz 64MB 170W £446/$463
Ryzen 9 7900X3D Zen 4 12C/24T 5.6GHz 4.4GHz 128MB 120W OOS/OOS
Ryzen 9 7900X Zen 4 12C/24T 5.6GHz 4.7GHz 64MB 170W £342/$340
Ryzen 7 7800X3D Zen 4 8C/16T 5.0GHz 4.2GHz 96MB 120W £416/$399
Ryzen 7 7700X Zen 4 8C/16T 5.4GHz 4.5GHz 32MB 105W £278/

$273

Ryzen 5 7600X Zen 4 6C/12T 5.3GHz 4.7GHz 32MB 105W £193/$212
Ryzen 5 7600 Zen 4 6C/12T 5.1GHz 3.8GHz 32MB 65W OOS/$185


An exceptionally clear and non-dusty testing rig, equipped with a Ryzen 9000 processor, RTX 4090 Founders Edition, ASRock Taichi X670E, and the Alphacool Aurora Eisbaer 240mm AiO. | Image credit: Digital Foundry

All evaluations were conducted on Windows 24H2 with the latest chipset drivers (7.01.07.634) and BIOS updates implemented (3.20 on our ASRock X670E Taichi). We utilized Nvidia’s slightly older 565.90 graphical drivers to maintain consistency with earlier results, as our testing suite does not include any games necessitating newer drivers. Resizable BAR and core isolation were activated on both systems.

Our current CPU testing platform primarily features the Nvidia GeForce Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition graphics card and Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 CL30 RAM. Each CPU is paired with a 1000W+ power supply from Corsair or NZXT, a high-quality 240mm or 360mm AiO cooler and a compatible high-end motherboard: the ASRock X670E Taichi for AMD Ryzen 7000 and 9000, the MSI Z890 Meg Ace for Intel Core Ultra 200S, the Gigabyte Aorus Z790 Master for 12th and 14th gen Intel Core, and the Asus ROG Crosshair 8 Hero for AMD Ryzen 5000 – with Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 CL16, as DDR5 RAM is not supported on this platform.

Storage needs are met by a range of PCIe 4.0 or PCIe 5.0 SSDs, including the WD SN5000 4TB NVMe SSD for our AMD Ryzen 9000 system.

Now, let’s proceed to the benchmark results to gain a better understanding of how the 9950X3D advances upon its predecessors. Ultimately, for pure gaming purposes, the 9800X3D might be entirely sufficient, so if you opted for the 9950X3D, you may be utilizing the additional cores for tasks like video production or 3D modeling.

Cinebench 2024 (1T) 2024 (MT) R20 (1T) R20 (MT)
Ryzen 5 3600X 77 578 485 3654
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 95 915 546 5746
Ryzen 9 5900X 98 1171 610 8393
Ryzen 5 7600X 114 845 744 5814
Ryzen 7 7700X 118 1127 758 7609
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 112 1074 688 6988
Ryzen 9 7900X 116 1605 776 11196
Ryzen 9 7950X 121 2004 784 14272
Ryzen 5 9600X 132 935 850 6358
Ryzen 7 9700X 130 1172 862 7851
Ryzen 9 9800X3D 134 1342 823 8938
Ryzen 9 9900X 135 1784 879 12617
Ryzen 9 9950X 138 2237 881 15845
Ryzen 9 9950X3D 139 2343 881 16343
Core i5 14600K 120 1400 777 9420
Core i7 14700K 127 1987 818 13614
Core i9 14900K 133 2107 875 15297
Extreme 5 245K 128 1435 841 9864
Extreme 9 285K 144 2386 895 16055

Starting with our Cinebench benchmark findings, including the classic R20 and the newer 2024 version, the 9950X3D clearly demonstrates enhanced performance over the 9950X by a minor margin – it’s approximately five percent quicker in CB 2024 multi-core and three percent faster in CB R20’s multi-core test. Remarkably, this means it currently holds the overall record in R20, coming in just ahead of the Core Extreme 285K, while closely following the same processor in Cinebench 2024.

In comparison to the previous generation 7950X, there’s also a significant advantage – around 15 percent in single-core and 17 percent in multi-core for CB 2024. The differences in Cinebench R20 are somewhat narrower, with a 12 percent single-core lead and a 15 percent multi-core edge.

Handbrake H264 (fps) HEVC (fps)
Ryzen 5 3600X 26.66 10.80
Ryzen 7 5800X3D 42.00 18.71
Ryzen 9 5900X 57.59 23.83
Ryzen 5 7600X 41.29 18.31
Ryzen 7 7700X 53.27 23.65
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 49.63 21.54
Ryzen 9 7900X 78.35 32.59
Ryzen 9 7950X 98.58 41.68
Ryzen 5 9600X 42.51 19.77
Ryzen 7 9700X (191W max) 51.80 23.79
Ryzen 7 9800X3D (259W max) 59.59 27.44
Ryzen 9 9900X 82.96 35.33
Ryzen 9 9950X (363W max) 105.43 45.35
Ryzen 9 9950X3D (403W max) 109.24 46.40
Intel Core i5 14600K 59.42 25.39
Intel Core i7 14700K 80.26 31.07
Intel Core i9 14900K (476W max) 85.06 35.08
Intel Extreme 5 245K (286W max) 61.05 26.88
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (362W max) 97.17 38.44

While Cinebench aims to evaluate a 3D modeling and animation task in Cinema 4D, our Cinebench assessment illustrates a solid use case for us: converting a Patreon video file into H.264 and H.265 (HEVC). In this instance, we observed the 9950X3D consuming a robust 403W at full capacity, surpassing the 9950X by a notable margin of 3.6 percent in the H.264 encoding and 2.3 percent in the HEVC encoding. It’s essential to clarify that the 403W reading represents a temporary power draw at the beginning of the test, with 300W-355W being a more common figure throughout the majority of the operation.

This performance is approximately 11 percent quicker than the 7950X for context, and similar in speed to the Intel Core Ultra 285K. We plan to re-evaluate the 245K and 285K soon to check if Intel’s anticipated performance enhancements have finally been realized, despite reports from other sources suggesting a less than favorable outlook.

Now, let’s dive into the heart of our evaluation, the gaming benchmarks. We have 11 games in total, in addition to an analysis of power consumption.

AMD Ryzen 7 9950X3D Review

Read More

  Default
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *